Is Imran Khan following Bhutto’s path? What happened to the leaders of the third world clash with the US?

Chief Editor PNI’s Notes:
The reprisal of the alleged torture on Azam Swati and Shehbaz Gul has also been heard in the annual report of the American administration on international human rights. Regarding Pakistan, the American administration has said in its report that human rights violations continued in Pakistan, human rights representative Idris Khattak was punished under the Army Act and close associates of the former Prime Minister claimed torture. This is not an ordinary sentence. In the annual human rights report of the American administration, this much mention is considered enough.

Whoever gave him this advice was a very ambitious person who was familiar with the psychology of Pakistanis. Millions of Pakistanis aspiring for an American green card, but they raise the slogan of “death for America” whenever they see any problem in their country, they do it without wasting a moment because this “chooran” (recipe) is sold the most in it.

A nation protecting geographical borders with American weapons, a nation that receives American wheat as aid. After shedding the young blood of their sons for years in the neighboring country to receive dollars, the Pakistani nation does not hesitate to shout against US whenever they get a chance.
Time proved that Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was a victim of American conspiracy. But his crime was huge. It was an unforgivable crime to base the program of making Pakistan a nuclear power. Bhutto was given an on-record to set an example. All the leaders of his time fell victim to such fate. King Faisal of Saudi Arabia was the first victim. Colonel Gaddafi of Libya, Iraq’s Saddam Hussein was the next. All were subjected to a terrible end. Yasir Arafat survived because he knew what should be done, so he followed their path. General Zia-ul-Haq continued to follow US policy as long as he did. But when the track changed, C130 was crashed. Muhammad Morsi of Egypt did not accept their line and remained rotting in jail after being overthrown.

Now it is said that Imran Khan was not tolerated when he said absolutely NOT. The question is when such a request/demand was made in response to which this was said. And if the intention is to take credit for all this, then why was a meeting with the members of the American Parliament requested in separation? In which the colleagues of his party who came from America were also separated. And above all, who forced Zalmay Khalilzad to speak? Whatever happens, the establishment runs the affairs in America as well. And this is the matter of the understanding, who can understand Let them draw the conclusion.