ICC prosecutor leaves US out of Afghan probe

The Hague, Sept 27 (AFP/APP):The International Criminal Court’s new prosecutor said Monday he would focus on the Taliban and Islamic State-Khorasan’s actions in Afghanistan instead of alleged US crimes.

Karim Khan asked judges to relaunch the court’s probe into Afghanistan, which was paused last year at Kabul’s request, saying the Taliban’s takeover meant war crimes would no longer be investigated properly.

But rights defenders reacted with fury after Khan, who took office in June with a vow to reform the ICC, announced that he would “deprioritise” the investigation into American forces and concentrate on Islamist groups.

The Hague-based ICC’s Afghan probe has long enraged Washington, and prompted the US administration of president Donald Trump to impose sanctions on Khan’s predecessor Fatou Bensouda.

Khan said “current de facto control of the territory of Afghanistan by the Taliban… represents a fundamental change in circumstances necessitating the present application” to reopen the investigation.

The now-deposed government in Kabul had asked the ICC in early 2020 to pause its inquiry while it probed war crimes domestically. The court can step in where member states are unable or willing to prosecute.
The ICC’s limited resources and the need to focus on cases most likely to result in convictions meant he would now narrow his focus in Afghanistan, Khan added.

– ‘Gravity and scale’ –

“I have therefore decided to focus my office’s investigations in Afghanistan on crimes allegedly committed by the Taliban and the Islamic State-Khorasan Province (“IS-K”) and to deprioritise other aspects of this investigation,” he said.

This was because of the “gravity, scale and continuing nature of alleged crimes by the Taliban and the Islamic State”, Khan said.
The ICC launched a preliminary probe there in 2006, with the mandate to investigate crimes dating back to when Afghanistan joined the court three years earlier.

Bensouda sought permission for a formal investigation in 2017, saying there was “reasonable basis to believe” war crimes had been committed by both the Taliban, and by US forces in Afghanistan and the CIA in secret detention centres abroad.

ICC judges rejected the opening of an investigation in 2019 saying it “would not serve the interests of justice” but appeals judges then gave the go-ahead in 2020 — only for the probe to be deferred at Afghanistan’s request.
Washington had long been hostile to the ICC, of which it is not a member, over the probe into Afghanistan. US forces left the country at the end of August after 20 years.

But while Khan said the ICC would “remain alive to its evidence preservation responsibilities, to the extent they arise” on US crimes, the focus would now be on Afghanistan’s new rulers and their IS-K rivals.

– ‘Shame’ –

The prosecutor added that the Taliban’s takeover itself “may constitute an unconstitutional transition of power” and added that “there is a reasonable basis to believe that persons affiliated with the Taliban committed crimes against humanity.”

Reports of the Taliban’s release of “thousands of prisoners allegedly linked to Al-Qaeda and IS terror groups… does not support the notion that the Taliban will genuinely investigate”.

The ICC prosecutor also specifically mentioned the deadly August 26 attack on Kabul airport claimed by IS-K in which 13 US service members and more than 100 Afghan civilians were killed.
The decision to end the ICC focus on US abuses in Afghanistan was greeted with fury in some quarters.

“Stunned,” tweeted Katherine Gallagher, a lawyer for Afghan victims of what they say was torture by US forces, adding that Khan had given them no advance warning of the move and they only found out when they read a press release.

“Next time I’m told about “victim-centered” #ICC by court officials or diplomats, academics… #SHAME”, added Gallagher.

Amnesty International campaigner Samira Hamidi said a US drone strike days before the pullout that wiped out 10 members of an Afghan family showed that the ICC “needs to revisit this decision and hold the US accountable too.”